Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Entrevista en Profundidad× | Entrevista semiestructurada× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Cualitativa | Cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | Mid-20th century (formalised in qualitative social research from the 1950s onward) | 1946 (Merton & Kendall); codified as a standard method through the 1980s–1990s |
| Autor original≠ | Rooted in sociological interviewing traditions; systematised by researchers including Steinar Kvale and Herbert J. Rubin | Robert K. Merton and Patricia Kendall (focused interview, 1946); further systematised by Steinar Kvale |
| Tipo | Qualitative research method | Qualitative research method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803958203 | Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761925422 |
| Alias | IDI, semi-structured interview, unstructured interview, qualitative interview | guided interview, semi-standardized interview, focused interview, SSI |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | The in-depth interview is a one-to-one qualitative data-collection method in which a researcher engages a participant in an extended, open-ended conversation to elicit rich, detailed accounts of experiences, perceptions, beliefs, or meanings. Unlike structured surveys, the interview guide serves as a flexible road map rather than a fixed script, allowing the researcher to probe unexpected directions as they emerge. The approach is foundational to qualitative inquiry and is used directly as a primary method or as the data-collection arm of phenomenology, grounded theory, narrative analysis, and other frameworks. | The semi-structured interview is a qualitative data-collection method in which the researcher prepares a set of key questions or topic areas in advance but remains free to probe, follow up, and reorder as the conversation evolves. Unlike structured interviews — which fix every question and sequence — or unstructured interviews — which are entirely open — the semi-structured format balances comparability across participants with the flexibility needed to capture the depth and nuance of individual perspectives. It is the most widely used interview format in social science, health, and education research. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|