ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Ideal Point Estimation×NOMINATE×
CampoPolitical SciencePolitical Science
FamiliaLatent structureLatent structure
Año de origen20041985
Autor originalClinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal
TipoLatent-variable spatial model of binary choice dataSpatial scaling model of roll-call voting
Fuente seminalClinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985). A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 357–384. DOI ↗
AliasIdeal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal pointsDW-NOMINATE, W-NOMINATE, Nominal Three-Step Estimation, Poole-Rosenthal scores
Relacionados43
ResumenIdeal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.NOMINATE — Nominal Three-step Estimation — is the family of spatial scaling procedures developed by Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal to recover legislators' ideological positions from roll-call votes. Each legislator and the yea and nay outcomes of each vote are placed in a low-dimensional space, and a normal (Gaussian) deterministic utility plus a random shock governs choices. Fitted by maximum likelihood, NOMINATE produces the canonical ideal-point coordinates used to chart polarization across two centuries of the U.S. Congress, with the dynamic DW-NOMINATE variant allowing positions to drift smoothly over time.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Ideal Point Estimation · NOMINATE. Recuperado el 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare