ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

HF-TOPSIS×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDM
Año de origen20131995
Autor originalXu, Z., Zhang, X.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipoDistance-to-ideal ranking (Hwang-Yoon 1981) extended to Hesitant Fuzzy Elements (HFE ⊂ [0,1]) via the hesitant normalised Euclidean distance d_1 (Xu-Xia 2011b); supports three weight-information modes: fully specified, completely unknown (Eq.(22) maximizing deviation closed-form), and partly known (Model M-2 linear programme).Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Fuente seminalXu, Z., Zhang, X. (2013). Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowledge-Based Systems DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Relacionados88
ResumenHF-TOPSIS (Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS with optional incomplete weight information (Xu-Zhang 2013 KBS)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Xu, Z., Zhang, X. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: HF-TOPSIS · CRITIC. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare