Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Efectos Heterogéneos del Tratamiento (CATE / Meta-Aprendices)× | Ajuste frontal (Criterio Frontdoor)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Inferencia causal | Inferencia causal |
| Familia | Regression model | Regression model |
| Año de origen≠ | 2018 | 1995 |
| Autor original≠ | Wager & Athey (causal forest); Künzel et al. (meta-learners) | Judea Pearl |
| Tipo≠ | Causal machine-learning framework | Causal identification (graphical adjustment) |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Wager, S. & Athey, S. (2018). Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association. DOI ↗ | Pearl, J. (1995). Causal Diagrams for Empirical Research. Biometrika, 82(4), 669-688. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | conditional average treatment effect, CATE, meta-learners, causal forest | frontdoor criterion, Pearl's frontdoor adjustment, frontdoor formula, Ön Kapı Düzenlemesi (Frontdoor Adjustment) |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | Heterogeneous Treatment Effects is a machine-learning framework that estimates how a treatment effect varies across individuals — the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). It bundles meta-learner strategies such as the T-Learner, S-Learner, X-Learner and R-Learner alongside the causal forest of Wager and Athey (2018) and Künzel et al. (2019). | Frontdoor adjustment is Judea Pearl's graphical identification strategy, introduced in 1995, that recovers the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome through a fully mediating variable even when an unobserved confounder sits between the treatment and the outcome. It is the go-to tool when the backdoor criterion cannot be satisfied because the confounder is unmeasured. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|