Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis del Discurso Basado en el Campo× | Teoría Fundamentada× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Cualitativa | Investigación cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1980s–1990s | 1967 |
| Autor original≠ | Synthesised from Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and discourse analysis; systematised by researchers including John Frow | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative analytical framework | Method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510302 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | field discourse analysis, Bourdieusian discourse analysis, sociological discourse analysis, FDA | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | Field-based discourse analysis integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — a structured social space of positions, capital, and struggle — with the close textual methods of discourse analysis. Rather than treating language as a neutral medium, it examines how discourse is produced, circulated, and received within specific social fields (education, law, journalism, science, etc.), and how discursive choices reflect and reproduce the distribution of power and capital within those fields. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|