Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis Crítico del Discurso Basado en el Campo× | Análisis del Discurso× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Cualitativa | Investigación cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1999–2001 | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Autor original≠ | Norman Fairclough and Lilie Chouliaraki (synthesis with Bourdieu's field theory) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative critical discourse framework | Method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510357 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Field-theoretic CDA, Bourdieusian CDA, sociological CDA, field-oriented discourse analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 2 |
| Resumen≠ | Field-based Critical Discourse Analysis (Field-based CDA) integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — structured social spaces with their own rules, capital, and positions — with the linguistic and critical tools of Critical Discourse Analysis. The approach examines how language constructs, legitimates, and contests power relations within specific institutional or social fields, situating texts in their broader sociological context rather than treating discourse in isolation. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|