Comparar métodos

	Feminist Discourse Analysis	Intersectionality Analysis
Campo	Gender Studies	Gender Studies
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	2005	1989
Autor original	Michelle M. Lazar	Kimberlé Crenshaw
Tipo	Critical feminist discourse-analytic method	Critical qualitative analytic framework
Fuente seminal	Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164.	Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Alias	Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis, FCDA, Feminist CDA	Intersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis
Relacionados	4	4
Resumen	Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis (FCDA) extends critical discourse analysis with an explicit feminist politics, examining how gender ideology and asymmetric power relations between women and men are produced, sustained, contested, and above all naturalized in texts and talk. Articulated by Michelle Lazar in her 2005 edited collection and 2007 programmatic article, it combines the close linguistic analysis of the CDA tradition with feminist theory to expose the often subtle, taken-for-granted sexism through which patriarchal arrangements come to seem ordinary and commonsensical.	Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.