Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Puntuación de Resultados de Pie y Tobillo× | Escala Funcional Específica del Paciente× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Medicina del deporte | Medicina del deporte |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 2001 | 1995 |
| Autor original≠ | Ewa M. Roos, Mats Brandsson, H. Hugelhotz, M. Klassbo, L. Stefan Lohmander | Paul W. Stratford, Gill Westaway, Colin Gill, Jill M. Binkley |
| Tipo | Patient self-report | Patient self-report |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Roos EM, Brandsson M, Hugelhotz H, Klassbo M, Lohmander LS. Development and validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;31(9):504-514. link ↗ | Stratford PW, Gill C, Westaway MD, Binkley JM. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient-specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47(4):258-263. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | FAOS | PSFS |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is a 42-item patient self-report instrument designed to assess symptoms, function, and activity limitations in individuals with foot and ankle pathology. Developed by Roos and colleagues in 2001 and published in the Journal of Orthopedic & Sports Physical Therapy, the FAOS has become the standard outcome measure in foot and ankle surgery and rehabilitation research, providing comprehensive evaluation across pain, stiffness, physical function, sport/recreation, and foot-ankle-related quality of life. | The Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) is a unique, individualized outcome instrument that captures patient-identified functional limitations and tracks change in those specific activities. Developed by Stratford and colleagues in 1995 and published in Physiotherapy Canada, the PSFS revolutionized patient-centered assessment by allowing each patient to identify and rate the three to five activities most important to them, rather than answering predetermined questions. This approach ensures relevance and maximizes the instrument's sensitivity to clinically meaningful change in patient-valued outcomes. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|