Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis del Discurso× | Etnografía Lingüística× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Investigación cualitativa | Lingüística |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) | 1998 |
| Autor original≠ | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell | Ben Rampton |
| Tipo≠ | Method | Empirical process pipeline |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ | Rampton, B. (2007). Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 584-607. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis | Ethnographic Linguistics, Sociolinguistic Ethnography |
| Relacionados | 2 | 2 |
| Resumen≠ | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. | Linguistic Ethnography is a qualitative research approach combining ethnographic fieldwork with detailed linguistic analysis to understand language use in cultural context. Developed by researchers like Ben Rampton, it examines how people use language within communities, institutions, and social interactions while paying attention to identity, power, and meaning-making. This method integrates sociolinguistics, anthropology, and discourse analysis to produce rich, contextualized understandings of language-in-society. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|