Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Cost-Utility Analysis× | Regulatory Impact Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Public Policy | Public Policy |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 2015 | 1995 |
| Autor original≠ | Health-economics community; standardised by Drummond and colleagues | Government regulatory-reform practice; standardised by the OECD |
| Tipo≠ | Economic evaluation expressing outcomes in utility-weighted health | Systematic ex-ante appraisal of proposed regulation |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199665877 | OECD (2020). Regulatory Impact Assessment, OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | CUA, Cost per QALY Analysis, QALY-Based Economic Evaluation | RIA, Regulatory Impact Assessment, Impact Assessment of Regulation |
| Relacionados≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a form of economic evaluation that compares the costs of alternative interventions with their outcomes expressed in a common, preference-based measure of health — most often the quality-adjusted life year (QALY), or in global health the disability-adjusted life year (DALY). By combining length and quality of life into a single index, CUA allows interventions with very different effects to be compared on a like-for-like basis, and it produces an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as cost per QALY gained. It is the dominant method for informing decisions about which health technologies and programs to fund. | Regulatory impact analysis (RIA) is a systematic process for appraising the likely costs, benefits and effects of proposed regulation before it is adopted. Promoted by the OECD as a cornerstone of good regulatory governance, it requires governments to define the problem a regulation is meant to solve, set out alternative options including non-regulatory ones, assess the impacts of each against a do-nothing baseline, consult affected parties, and recommend the option that delivers the greatest net benefit. RIA aims to ensure that new rules are evidence-based, proportionate and justified rather than imposed without examination of their consequences. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|