Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| COSMIN Checklist× | Cochrane RoB 2.0× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Metodología de la investigación | Metodología de la investigación |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 2010 | 2019 |
| Autor original≠ | Mokkink et al. (COSMIN Group) | Jonathan Sterne, Julian Higgins (Cochrane Collaboration) |
| Tipo≠ | Measurement instrument evaluation | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. DOI ↗ | Sterne, J. A., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., ... & Higgins, J. P. (2019). RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | COSMIN | RoB 2.0, RoB 2 |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is a systematic framework and 10-item checklist developed by Mokkink et al. (2010) to evaluate the methodological quality of studies that assess the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), questionnaires, and clinical scales. COSMIN guides the development, validation, and selection of health measurement instruments across clinical research and practice. | RoB 2 is the Cochrane Collaboration's updated methodology for assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Published in 2019, it replaced the original Cochrane RoB tool with a more structured, transparent approach using signalling questions and domain-based judgments to evaluate five critical sources of bias. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|