Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Evaluación Proporcional Compleja× | Proceso Analítico Jerárquico× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Toma de decisiones | Toma de decisiones |
| Familia | MCDM | MCDM |
| Año de origen≠ | 1996 | 1980 |
| Autor original≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tipo≠ | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Relacionados | 8 | 8 |
| Resumen≠ | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|