Comparar métodos

	Método Condorcet	Proceso Analítico Jerárquico	PROMETHEE II
Campo	Toma de decisiones	Toma de decisiones	Toma de decisiones
Familia	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Año de origen	1900	1980	1986
Autor original	Marquis de Condorcet	Saaty, T. L.	Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B.
Tipo	Pairwise majority rule — winner beats every other alternative in pairwise contest	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Preference function (net flow)
Fuente seminal	Marquis de Condorcet (1900). Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix (1785). Imprimerie Royale, Paris (original 1785)	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research
Alias	—	—	—
Relacionados	5	8	8
Resumen	CONDORCET (Condorcet Method — Pairwise majority winner from ranked ballots) is a aggregationoperator multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Marquis de Condorcet in 1900. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	PROMETHEE (PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.