Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis de Ítems de Pruebas Adaptativas Computarizadas× | Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio (AFC)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Psicometría | Psicometría |
| Familia | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Año de origen≠ | 1970s–1990s | 1969 |
| Autor original≠ | Lord, Weiss, and colleagues in psychometric research on adaptive testing | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Tipo≠ | Item calibration and evaluation | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Fuente seminal≠ | van der Linden, W. J. & Glas, C. A. W. (Eds.) (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN: 978-0792365556 | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | CAT item analysis, adaptive item calibration, IRT-based CAT item evaluation, adaptive item parameter estimation | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | Computerized adaptive test item analysis evaluates and calibrates items intended for use in adaptive testing environments. Unlike fixed-form analysis, it accounts for the non-random item exposure inherent in adaptive administration, using item response theory to estimate item parameters, information functions, and exposure rates across the ability continuum. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|