Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Investigación Histórica Comparada de Archivos× | Método de Historia Oral× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Métodos de campo | Métodos de campo |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | Late 19th century (archival foundations); mid-20th century (comparative systematic application) | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s |
| Autor original≠ | Leopold von Ranke (archival history); Theda Skocpol, Barrington Moore (comparative-historical synthesis) | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative historical-empirical method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521294997 | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 |
| Alias | comparative-historical analysis, cross-national archival research, comparative archival history, CHAR | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Comparative historical archival research combines systematic examination of primary archival sources across two or more historical cases — nations, regions, institutions, or time periods — to identify causal patterns, structural similarities, and divergences that single-case histories cannot reveal. It is the method of choice when researchers want to explain why similar or different outcomes emerged across distinct historical contexts using documentary evidence. | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|