Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Investigación Histórica Comparada de Archivos× | Investigación Histórica de Archivos× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Métodos de campo | Métodos de campo |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | Late 19th century (archival foundations); mid-20th century (comparative systematic application) | 19th century (formalized ~1820s–1880s) |
| Autor original≠ | Leopold von Ranke (archival history); Theda Skocpol, Barrington Moore (comparative-historical synthesis) | Historians and archivists; systematised through the professionalization of historical scholarship in the 19th century |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative primary-source research |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521294997 | Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival Strategies and Techniques. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803951853 |
| Alias | comparative-historical analysis, cross-national archival research, comparative archival history, CHAR | archival research, historical document analysis, archival history, primary source research |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Comparative historical archival research combines systematic examination of primary archival sources across two or more historical cases — nations, regions, institutions, or time periods — to identify causal patterns, structural similarities, and divergences that single-case histories cannot reveal. It is the method of choice when researchers want to explain why similar or different outcomes emerged across distinct historical contexts using documentary evidence. | Historical archival research is a systematic method of investigating the past through the critical examination of primary source documents preserved in archives, libraries, and institutional collections. Researchers locate, access, authenticate, and interpret original records — such as government documents, correspondence, diaries, maps, and institutional files — to reconstruct events, trace processes, and build evidence-based historical arguments. It is foundational to historiography and widely applied across humanities and social science disciplines. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|