Comparar métodos

	Análisis Comparativo de la Conversación	Análisis del discurso comparativo
Campo	Cualitativa	Cualitativa
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	1974 (CA foundation); comparative applications from 1980s–1990s	1980s–1990s (established as comparative practice through the 1990s)
Autor original	Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundation); comparative extension developed across the field from the 1980s onward	Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk
Tipo	Qualitative micro-analytic research design	Qualitative comparative research approach
Fuente seminal	Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.	Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman. ISBN: 978-0582219526
Alias	comparative CA, cross-contextual conversation analysis, comparative interactional analysis, comparative talk-in-interaction	CDA comparative, cross-context discourse analysis, comparative text analysis, multi-site discourse analysis
Relacionados	3	5
Resumen	Comparative Conversation Analysis (comparative CA) applies the rigorous micro-analytic methods of Conversation Analysis across two or more contrasting interactional settings, languages, cultures, or participant groups. It examines how the sequential organisation of talk — turn-taking, repair, adjacency pairs, and action formation — varies or remains stable across contexts, producing cross-contextual evidence about the architecture of human interaction.	Comparative discourse analysis examines how language constructs meaning, identity, and power by systematically contrasting texts or speech acts drawn from at least two distinct contexts, groups, time periods, or institutions. By holding analytical categories constant across cases, it reveals how discursive patterns diverge or converge, producing insights that single-context discourse analysis cannot generate.