Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Teoría Fundamentada Clásica Comparativa× | Teoría Fundamentada× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Cualitativa | Investigación cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s | 1967 |
| Autor original≠ | Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by Glaser | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative theory-building design | Method |
| Fuente seminal | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theory | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|