Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Grounded Theory Clásica× | Investigación-acción× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Cualitativa | Investigación cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1967 | 1946 |
| Autor original≠ | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗ | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Glaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GT | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 1 |
| Resumen≠ | Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks. | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|