Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Ponderación objetiva por correlación de criterios y desviación estándar× | Evaluación de Razón Aditiva× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Toma de decisiones | Toma de decisiones |
| Familia | MCDM | MCDM |
| Año de origen | 2010 | 2010 |
| Autor original≠ | Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Tipo≠ | Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Relacionados | 8 | 8 |
| Resumen≠ | CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|