Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Prueba Binomial Exacta× | Prueba z para dos proporciones× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Estadística | Estadística |
| Familia≠ | Regression model | Hypothesis test |
| Año de origen≠ | 1988 | 1900 |
| Autor original≠ | Classical exact test; textbook treatment by Siegel & Castellan | Karl Pearson / classical large-sample z approximation |
| Tipo≠ | Exact one-sample test for a proportion | Parametric proportion comparison |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0070573574 | Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (3rd ed.). Wiley. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | exact binomial test, binomial probability test, exact test for a proportion, Tam Binom Testi | z-test for proportions, two-sample proportion test, one-proportion z-test, Oran Testi — z Testi (Oranlar) |
| Relacionados≠ | 2 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | The exact binomial test checks whether the observed number of successes in a fixed number of independent trials is consistent with a pre-specified success probability p₀. Because it computes exact binomial tail probabilities rather than relying on a normal approximation, it is the gold standard for testing a proportion in small samples; this two-sided formulation follows Siegel & Castellan's classic treatment (1988). | The proportion test (z-test for proportions) is a parametric hypothesis test that compares one or two sample proportions against a reference value or each other. Grounded in the large-sample normal approximation formalized by Fleiss, Levin, and Paik (2003), it is the standard tool for binary outcome comparisons when samples are large enough for the central limit theorem to apply. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|