Comparar métodos

	Public Sector Benchmarking	Public Procurement Performance Analysis
Campo	Public Administration	Public Administration
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	1989	2018
Autor original	Robert C. Camp	OECD & World Bank (MAPS framework)
Tipo	Comparative performance improvement method	Performance assessment framework
Fuente seminal	Camp, R. C. (1989). Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance. Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press. ISBN: 9780873890588	OECD. Public Procurement: principles, indicators and performance resources. Paris: OECD.
Alias	Government Benchmarking, Comparative Performance Benchmarking, Best-Practice Benchmarking, Public Service Benchmarking	Procurement Performance Measurement, Public Purchasing Performance Analysis, Procurement KPI Analysis, Public Contracting Performance Assessment
Relacionados	4	4
Resumen	Public sector benchmarking is the structured comparison of an organisation's processes, costs and outcomes against those of high-performing peers in order to identify gaps and adopt better practices. Formalised for management by Robert Camp at Xerox in his 1989 book, benchmarking moves from simply ranking who is best to understanding why the best perform well and how their practices can be adapted. In government it spans comparisons across municipalities, agencies, hospitals or schools, and underpins international comparative datasets such as the OECD's Government at a Glance. The aim is learning and improvement, not merely producing a league table.	Public procurement performance analysis is the systematic measurement and evaluation of how well a government's purchasing system delivers value for money, efficiency, competition, compliance and integrity. Because procurement typically accounts for a large share of public spending — around a third of government expenditure in many OECD countries — even modest improvements yield substantial returns. The discipline computes key performance indicators from tender and contract data, benchmarks them against peers and standards, and flags risks such as collusion or corruption. Internationally it is structured by the OECD's procurement principles and the World Bank and OECD's Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems (MAPS).