Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Prueba t bayesiana× | ANOVA bayesiana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Bayesiano | Bayesiano |
| Familia | Bayesian methods | Bayesian methods |
| Año de origen≠ | 2009 | 2012 |
| Autor original≠ | Rouder, Speckman, Sun, Morey & Iverson | Rouder, Morey, Speckman & Province |
| Tipo≠ | Bayesian hypothesis test | Bayesian hypothesis test / group comparison |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D. & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t Tests for Accepting and Rejecting the Null Hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. DOI ↗ | Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L. & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes Factors for ANOVA Designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | bayesian two-sample t-test, bayes factor t-test, Bayesçi t-Testi | bayesian analysis of variance, bayes factor ANOVA, JZS ANOVA, Bayesçi ANOVA — Bayes Faktörü ile Grup Karşılaştırması |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | The Bayesian t-test, formalised by Rouder and colleagues in 2009, is a two-group comparison method that works within a Bayesian framework. Instead of a p-value, it produces a Bayes Factor (BF₁₀) that quantifies the evidence the data provide for the alternative hypothesis relative to the null, and it reports the full posterior distribution of the standardised effect size δ with a highest-density interval. | Bayesian ANOVA, formalised by Rouder, Morey, Speckman and Province (2012), tests whether group means differ by quantifying the evidence for the alternative hypothesis relative to the null using the Bayes Factor (BF₁₀). Unlike classical ANOVA, it can also measure evidence in favour of the null hypothesis, making it equally informative when groups do not differ. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|