ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Evaluación Bayesiana Contrafactual del Impacto×Diferencias en Diferencias Bayesiano×
CampoInferencia causalInferencia causal
FamiliaRegression modelRegression model
Año de origen2015 (canonical implementation); Rubin potential outcomes: 1974-20052015-2023
Autor originalBrodersen, Gallusser, Koehler, Remy & Scott; Rubin potential outcomes frameworkLi & Marchand (formal Bayesian DiD framework); Brodersen et al. (Bayesian causal inference in time series)
TipoBayesian causal inference / counterfactual estimationBayesian causal inference / panel regression
Fuente seminalBrodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. DOI ↗Li, F., & Marchand, J. (2023). Bayesian inference for difference-in-differences. Econometrics Journal, 26(3), 509-529. link ↗
AliasBayesian CIE, Bayesian causal impact, Bayesian structural time-series causal inference, BSTS counterfactual evaluationBayesian DiD, Bayes DiD, Bayesian diff-in-diff, Bayesian panel causal estimator
Relacionados55
ResumenBayesian Counterfactual Impact Evaluation estimates the causal effect of an intervention by constructing a Bayesian posterior distribution over the counterfactual outcome — what would have happened without treatment. The method, popularized by Brodersen et al. (2015) through the CausalImpact framework, uses Bayesian structural time-series models fitted on the pre-intervention period to predict the counterfactual trajectory, then compares observed post-intervention outcomes to that prediction.Bayesian Difference-in-Differences applies Bayesian statistical inference to the classic DiD design, replacing frequentist point estimates with full posterior distributions over the treatment effect. This yields not only an estimate of the causal effect but also a coherent probability statement about its magnitude and uncertainty, making it especially useful when sample sizes are modest or informative prior knowledge is available.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Bayesian Counterfactual Impact Evaluation · Bayesian Difference-in-Differences. Recuperado el 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare