ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Precisión equilibrada×Exactitud×Puntuación F1×Sensibilidad×
CampoEvaluación de modelosEvaluación de modelosEvaluación de modelosEvaluación de modelos
FamiliaMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
Año de origen201020th century197920th century
Autor originalBrodersen, Ong, Stephan, and BuhmannHistorical statistical foundationsC. J. van RijsbergenHistorical statistical foundations
TipoEvaluation metricEvaluation metricEvaluation metricEvaluation metric
Fuente seminalBrodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124. DOI ↗Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information Retrieval (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. link ↗Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗
AliasAverage Recall, Equal-weight Average SensitivityOverall Accuracy, Correct Classification RateF-measure, Harmonic MeanSensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR
Relacionados5555
ResumenBalanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset.Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions among the total number of predictions made by a classification model. It is the most intuitive performance metric and measures how often the classifier makes correct predictions overall, regardless of class.The F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a single metric that balances both concerns. It was introduced by van Rijsbergen in information retrieval and has become a standard metric for evaluating classification models where both precision and recall are important.Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Balanced Accuracy · Accuracy · F1-Score · Recall (Sensitivity). Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare