ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation)×Método de ponderación objetiva CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs)×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDM
Año de origen20222016
Autor originalZdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TipoTwo-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregationRelative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Fuente seminalZdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Alias
Relacionados88
ResumenAROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: AROMAN · CILOS. Recuperado el 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare