Malmquist Firm Productivity Index
The Malmquist firm productivity index measures how a firm's total factor productivity changes between two periods and decomposes that change into two strategically meaningful parts: catching up to best practice (efficiency change) and the best-practice frontier itself shifting (technical change). The index is grounded in Caves, Christensen and Diewert's 1982 theory of productivity index numbers built from distance functions, and was made operational for empirical work by Fare, Grosskopf, Norris and Zhang in 1994, who showed how to compute it from data using linear-programming distance functions and to split it into efficiency-change and frontier-shift components. For firms, it answers whether productivity gains came from better management closing the gap to the leaders or from the whole industry's technological possibilities expanding.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84(1), 66-83. link ↗
- Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50(6), 1393-1414. DOI: 10.2307/1913388 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Malmquist Firm Productivity Index (TFP Change Decomposition for Firms). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/strategic-management/malmquist-firm-productivity
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Data Envelopment Analysis of Firm Strategic EfficiencyStrategic Management↔ compare
- Stochastic Frontier Firm Efficiency AnalysisStrategic Management↔ compare
- Tobin's Q Firm Value AnalysisStrategic Management↔ compare