Historical-Critical Exegesis
Historical-critical exegesis is the dominant scholarly approach to interpreting the Bible: it reads each text in its original language, genre, and historical setting in order to recover what its author meant and what its first audience would have understood. Rather than reading scripture through later doctrine or present concerns, it asks the historical question first. The method is not one technique but an integrated family that draws on textual, source, form, and redaction criticism, applying them within a grammatico-historical reading. Edgar Krentz's compact 1975 The Historical-Critical Method describes its rise, goals, and procedures, while John Barton's 2007 The Nature of Biblical Criticism offers a philosophical defense, arguing that biblical criticism is at heart a disciplined attention to what the text means in its literary and historical context.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Krentz, E. (1975). The Historical-Critical Method. Philadelphia: Fortress Press (Guides to Biblical Scholarship). ISBN: 9780800604608
- Barton, J. (2007). The Nature of Biblical Criticism. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN: 9780664225872
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Historical-Critical Exegesis (Grammatico-Historical Interpretation of Scripture). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/religious-studies/historical-critical-exegesis
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Form CriticismReligious Studies↔ compare
- Redaction CriticismReligious Studies↔ compare
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ compare
- Stemmatic Textual CriticismReligious Studies↔ compare