Accountability Mechanism Analysis
Accountability mechanism analysis provides a structured way to identify, describe and evaluate the relationships through which public actors must explain and justify their conduct to others. Mark Bovens, in his 2007 conceptual framework, defines accountability narrowly as a relationship in which an actor has an obligation to render an account of conduct to a forum that can pose questions, pass judgement, and impose consequences. The method first maps these relationships, then classifies them by the type of forum and obligation, and finally assesses them against political, constitutional and learning perspectives. Its purpose is to bring analytical precision to a concept that is otherwise used as a vague synonym for good governance.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x ↗
- Bovens, M. (1998). The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521629959
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Accountability Mechanism Analysis in Public Governance. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/public-administration/accountability-mechanism-analysis
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Co-Production AssessmentPublic Administration↔ compare
- Collaborative Governance AssessmentPublic Administration↔ compare
- Principal-Agent Analysis in the Public SectorPublic Administration↔ compare
- Transaction Cost Analysis in the Public SectorPublic Administration↔ compare