ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelinePolitical networks

Cosponsorship Network Analysis

Cosponsorship network analysis treats legislative collaboration as a social network: when legislators cosponsor one another's bills, they form ties, and the resulting web of connections can be measured with the tools of network science. Introduced to congressional studies by James Fowler in 2006, it turns the public record of who signed on to whose bills into a graph among lawmakers, revealing who is central and influential, how connected the chamber is, and which clusters of legislators form coalitions. With inferential network models such as ERGMs, researchers move from describing the network to explaining why ties form.

Open in MethodMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Sources

  1. Fowler, J. H. (2006). Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks. Political Analysis, 14(4), 456–487. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpl002
  2. Cranmer, S. J., & Desmarais, B. A. (2011). Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models. Political Analysis, 19(1), 66–86. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpr032

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Legislative Cosponsorship Network Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/political-science/cosponsorship-network-analysis

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side
ScholarGateCosponsorship Network Analysis (Legislative Cosponsorship Network Analysis). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/political-science/cosponsorship-network-analysis · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026