ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineComparative / historical analysis

Comparative Historical Analysis

Comparative historical analysis (CHA) is a macro-causal research tradition that explains large-scale outcomes — revolutions, regime change, welfare states, development paths — by systematically comparing a small number of cases reconstructed in depth across historical time. It combines cross-case comparison with close attention to temporality: sequences, timing, critical junctures, and path dependence. Associated with Barrington Moore, Theda Skocpol, and codified by Mahoney and Rueschemeyer, CHA treats history not as background but as the medium through which causes operate.

Open in MethodMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Sources

  1. Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.) (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521016452
  2. Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521294997

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Comparative Historical Analysis (Macro-Causal Comparison of Cases over Time). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/political-science/comparative-historical-analysis

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

Referenced by

ScholarGateComparative Historical Analysis (Comparative Historical Analysis (Macro-Causal Comparison of Cases over Time)). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/political-science/comparative-historical-analysis · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026