Causal Mediation Analysis in Politics
Causal mediation analysis decomposes the effect of a treatment — often a randomized experimental manipulation, such as a campaign message or an information treatment — into the part transmitted through a specified intermediate variable, the mediator, and the part operating through all other pathways. Formalized in the potential-outcomes framework by Imai, Keele, Tingley, and Yamamoto, it defines the average causal mediation effect (ACME) and the average direct effect, makes explicit the sequential-ignorability assumption required to identify them, and supplies a sensitivity analysis for when that assumption fails. It lets political scientists move beyond 'does the treatment work?' to 'why does it work?'
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309–334. DOI: 10.1037/a0020761 ↗
- Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 765–789. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055411000414 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Causal Mediation Analysis in Political Science (Direct and Indirect Effects of Treatments). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/political-science/causal-mediation-analysis-politics
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Causal Mediation AnalysisCausal inference↔ compare
- Dynamic Panel Data ModelEconometrics↔ compare
- Mediation AnalysisStatistics↔ compare
- Multilevel ModelingResearch Statistics↔ compare
- Survey ExperimentPolitical Science↔ compare