ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineField experimental designs

Audit Experiment

An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.

Open in MethodMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Sources

  1. Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00515.x
  2. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013. DOI: 10.1257/0002828042002561

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Audit Experiment (Correspondence / Field Audit Study). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/political-science/audit-experiment

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

Referenced by

ScholarGateAudit Experiment (Audit Experiment (Correspondence / Field Audit Study)). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/political-science/audit-experiment · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026