Elite Cue Experiment
An elite cue experiment isolates the persuasive power of source endorsements by holding a policy message constant and randomly varying who is said to support it. Grounded in John Zaller's receive-accept-sample model of mass opinion, which holds that citizens take cues from trusted political elites rather than reasoning from first principles, the design reveals how much opinion moves simply because a party or leader takes a side. Stephen Nicholson's work on polarizing cues shows that in-party endorsements can persuade while out-party endorsements provoke backlash, making the cue, not the argument, the engine of opinion change.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521407861
- Nicholson, S. P. (2012). Polarizing Cues. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 52-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00541.x ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Elite Cue Experiment (Party-Endorsement Persuasion Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/political-psychology/elite-cue-experiment
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Democratic Norms Support MeasurementPolitical Psychology↔ compare
- Issue Framing ExperimentPolitical Psychology↔ compare
- Partisan Motivated Reasoning ParadigmPolitical Psychology↔ compare