Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment
The Three-Component Model (TCM) of organizational commitment, developed by John Meyer and Natalie Allen, is the dominant framework for understanding why employees stay with and bind themselves to their organizations. Its central claim is that commitment is not one thing but three distinguishable psychological states: affective commitment (an emotional desire to stay — you want to), continuance commitment (the perceived cost of leaving — you need to), and normative commitment (a felt obligation — you ought to). Each is measured by its own subscale and arises from different antecedents, and although all three reduce turnover, they relate very differently to performance, citizenship, and well-being. Allen and Meyer's 1991 paper laid out the conceptualization, and Meyer, Stanley, Herscovitch, and Topolnytsky's 2002 meta-analysis confirmed that the components are distinguishable and have systematically different correlates and consequences.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. DOI: 10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z ↗
- Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52. DOI: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment (Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/organizational-behavior/organizational-commitment-tcm
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Job Demands-Resources ModelOrganizational Behavior↔ compare
- Perceived Organizational Support ScaleOrganizational Behavior↔ compare
- Utrecht Work Engagement ScaleSocial Psychology↔ compare