Acceptability Judgment Task
The acceptability judgment task is the modern, quantified successor to informal grammaticality judgments: instead of a single linguist marking a sentence grammatical or not, many participants rate carefully controlled sentences on a graded scale, and the ratings are analyzed statistically. Built on factorial designs with fillers and counterbalancing, and on response formats from Likert scales to magnitude estimation to forced choice, it turns intuition into replicable, gradient data. The approach anchors the experimental-syntax program associated with Jon Sprouse and colleagues, which tests grammatical hypotheses with the same methodological rigor as psycholinguistic experiments.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Sprouse, J., Schütze, C. T., & Almeida, D. (2013). A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua, 134, 219–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002 ↗
- Bard, E. G., Robertson, D., & Sorace, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72(1), 32–68. DOI: 10.2307/416793 ↗
- Schütze, C. T. (2016). The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Language Science Press. DOI: 10.17169/langsci.b89.100 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Acceptability Judgment Task. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/linguistics/acceptability-judgment-task
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Elicited Imitation TaskLinguistics↔ compare
- Grammaticality Judgment TaskLinguistics↔ compare
- Self-Paced Reading TaskLinguistics↔ compare