Historical Process Tracing
Historical process tracing is a within-case method for establishing causation by following a hypothesized mechanism step by step through the sequence of events that links a cause to an outcome. Systematized for the social sciences by Alexander George and Andrew Bennett and refined by James Mahoney, the approach treats history not as a source of correlations across cases but as a chain of intervening steps whose presence or absence can confirm or refute rival explanations. Instead of asking whether a cause covaries with an outcome across many units, process tracing asks whether the connecting mechanism actually operated in the case at hand, examining diagnostic pieces of evidence, causal-process observations, against the predictions of competing hypotheses. Drawing on the logic of Bayesian updating and on tests such as the hoop test and the smoking-gun test, it offers a disciplined way to leverage rich qualitative detail for strong causal inference in single cases and small comparisons typical of historical institutionalism.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262572224
- Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521016452
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Comparative Historical Process Tracing. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/historical-institutionalism/comparative-historical-process-tracing
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Critical Junctures AnalysisHistorical Institutionalism↔ compare
- Longue Duree AnalysisHistoriography↔ compare
- Path Dependence AnalysisHistorical Institutionalism↔ compare