ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineExcess mortality & sex ratios

Missing Women Estimation

Missing women estimation quantifies the number of women and girls who are absent from a population because of gender bias in mortality and, in some settings, sex-selective abortion. Introduced by economist Amartya Sen in 1990 and 1992, the method compares the observed female population (or female deaths) with the number expected under a benchmark sex ratio that would prevail absent discrimination. The resulting deficit — famously estimated at more than 100 million worldwide — is a stark demographic measure of cumulative anti-female bias.

Open in MethodMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Missing Women Estimation
Gender Inequality IndexLife Table

Sources

  1. Sen, A. (1992). Missing women. BMJ, 304(6827), 587–588. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6827.587
  2. Sen, A. (1990). More than 100 million women are missing. The New York Review of Books, 37(20), 61–66. link
  3. Anderson, S., & Ray, D. (2010). Missing women: Age and disease. The Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1262–1300. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2010.00609.x

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Estimation of Missing Women from Excess Female Mortality. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/gender-studies/missing-women-estimation

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side
ScholarGateMissing Women Estimation (Estimation of Missing Women from Excess Female Mortality). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/gender-studies/missing-women-estimation · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026