Three Horizons Framework
The Three Horizons framework is a structured way of thinking about transformative change by mapping three overlapping curves of activity across time. Developed within the International Futures Forum and given its definitive articulation by Bill Sharpe, Anthony Hodgson, Graham Leicester and colleagues in their 2016 Ecology and Society paper, it distinguishes the first horizon (H1), the dominant present system that is declining in its fit with a changing world; the third horizon (H3), an emerging and viable future pattern that is currently marginal but growing; and the second horizon (H2), the turbulent zone of transition in which entrepreneurial innovations and experiments compete, some carrying the system toward H3 and others merely propping up H1. Rather than predicting a single future, the framework is a pathways practice that helps groups see the present as a contested landscape of patterns and locate their own intentions and actions within it.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Sharpe, B., Hodgson, A., Leicester, G., Lyon, A., & Fazey, I. (2016). Three horizons: a pathways practice for transformation. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 47. DOI: 10.5751/ES-08388-210247 ↗
- Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight, 9(1), 5-25. DOI: 10.1108/14636680710727516 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Three Horizons Framework (A Pathways Practice for Transformation). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/futures-foresight-studies/three-horizons-framework
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Causal Layered AnalysisFutures Foresight Studies↔ compare
- Manoa Alternative Futures MethodFutures Foresight Studies↔ compare
- Visioning Preferred Futures WorkshopFutures Foresight Studies↔ compare