ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineRobust poverty comparison

Poverty Dominance Analysis

Poverty dominance analysis asks whether one distribution has unambiguously less poverty than another for a whole class of poverty measures and a whole range of poverty lines, rather than for a single index and a single line. Building on Anthony Atkinson's 1987 stochastic-dominance treatment of poverty and the Foster-Shorrocks 1988 poverty-orderings results, it compares cumulative distribution functions (poverty incidence curves) and their successive integrals (poverty deficit and severity curves). When the curve for one distribution lies everywhere below another, that distribution has less poverty for every measure in a corresponding class and every line in the range — a robust conclusion immune to the index-and-line arbitrariness that bedevils single-number comparisons.

Apply with EconMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Sources

  1. Atkinson, A. B. (1987). On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica, 55(4), 749–764. DOI: 10.2307/1911028
  2. Foster, J. E., & Shorrocks, A. F. (1988). Poverty orderings. Econometrica, 56(1), 173–177. DOI: 10.2307/1911846

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Stochastic Dominance and Poverty Orderings for Robust Poverty Comparisons. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/economics/dominance-analysis-poverty

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

Referenced by

ScholarGatePoverty Dominance Analysis (Stochastic Dominance and Poverty Orderings for Robust Poverty Comparisons). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/economics/dominance-analysis-poverty · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026