ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelinePoverty dynamics analysis

Datt-Ravallion Decomposition

The Datt-Ravallion decomposition, introduced by Gaurav Datt and Martin Ravallion in 1992, separates the observed change in a poverty measure between two dates into a growth component — the change attributable to a shift in mean income holding the relative distribution fixed — and a redistribution component — the change attributable to a shift in the Lorenz curve holding mean income fixed. A residual captures the interaction between the two. It became the standard way to ask whether falling poverty was driven by rising average incomes or by changes in inequality, and underlies the empirical literature on pro-poor growth.

Apply with EconMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Sources

  1. Datt, G., & Ravallion, M. (1992). Growth and redistribution components of changes in poverty measures: a decomposition with applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s. Journal of Development Economics, 38(2), 275–295. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(92)90001-P

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Datt-Ravallion Growth and Redistribution Decomposition of Poverty Change. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/economics/datt-ravallion-decomposition

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

Referenced by

ScholarGateDatt-Ravallion Decomposition (Datt-Ravallion Growth and Redistribution Decomposition of Poverty Change). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/economics/datt-ravallion-decomposition · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026