Theory-Based Impact Evaluation
Theory-based impact evaluation evaluates a programme by first making explicit the theory of change — the causal chain of assumptions and mechanisms through which inputs are expected to produce outcomes and impacts — and then gathering evidence to test whether each link in that chain holds. Rather than treating the programme as a black box and estimating only the net effect, it asks not just whether a programme worked but why, for whom, and under what conditions. Articulated by Carol Weiss and brought into development practice by Howard White and 3ie, it complements, rather than competes with, counterfactual designs.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- White, H. (2009). Theory-Based Impact Evaluation: Principles and Practice. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1(3), 271–284. DOI: 10.1080/19439340903114628 ↗
- Weiss, C. H. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New Directions for Evaluation, 1997(76), 41–55. DOI: 10.1002/ev.1086 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Theory-Based Impact Evaluation (Theory of Change / Contribution Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/development-studies/theory-based-impact-evaluation
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Logical Framework ApproachDevelopment Studies↔ compare
- Most Significant Change for DevelopmentDevelopment Studies↔ compare
- Randomized Evaluation in DevelopmentDevelopment Studies↔ compare
- Results-Based ManagementDevelopment Studies↔ compare