Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Value Chain Analysis for Development× | Gender Analysis in Development× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Development Studies | Development Studies |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 2001 | 1989 |
| Originator≠ | Raphael Kaplinsky & Mike Morris; Gary Gereffi, John Humphrey & Timothy Sturgeon | Caroline Moser; Naila Kabeer; Harvard Institute (Overholt et al.); March, Smyth & Mukhopadhyay (comparative synthesis) |
| Type≠ | Systemic market and sectoral analysis framework | Family of analytical frameworks for gender in development |
| Seminal source≠ | Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2001). A Handbook for Value Chain Research. Institute of Development Studies / IDRC, Brighton. link ↗ | Moser, C. O. N. (1989). Gender planning in the Third World: Meeting practical and strategic gender needs. World Development, 17(11), 1799–1825. DOI ↗ |
| Aliases | Pro-Poor Value Chain Analysis, Inclusive Value Chain Analysis, Global Value Chain Analysis, Value Chain Development | Gender Analysis Frameworks, Gender and Development Analysis, Comparative Gender Analysis, Gender Planning |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | Value Chain Analysis examines the full sequence of activities required to bring a product or service from conception through production to final consumers and beyond, asking who does what, who governs the chain, and how the value created is distributed among participants. In its development and pro-poor variant, codified in Kaplinsky and Morris's IDS handbook and grounded in Gereffi's global-value-chain theory, the method is used to identify how poor producers and workers can capture a larger or more secure share of value through upgrading and inclusion. | Gender Analysis in Development is the systematic examination of the different roles, responsibilities, resources, and constraints of women and men, and of the relations between them, in order to understand how development interventions affect and are affected by gender. Spanning a family of frameworks — the Harvard Analytical Framework, Caroline Moser's gender-planning approach, and Naila Kabeer's Social Relations Approach — it provides comparative tools to surface inequalities, distinguish practical from strategic needs, and design interventions and gender-mainstreaming strategies grounded in sex-disaggregated evidence. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|