Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Tourism Product Conjoint Analysis× | Destination Choice Experiment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Tourism | Tourism |
| Family | Regression model | Regression model |
| Year of origin≠ | 1978 | 2000 |
| Originator≠ | Paul Green & V. Srinivasan (conjoint analysis); applied to tourism products | Jordan Louviere, David Hensher & Joffre Swait; applied to destinations by Twan Huybers |
| Type≠ | Decompositional part-worth model of multi-attribute travel-product preference | Stated-choice discrete-choice model of destination attribute trade-offs |
| Seminal source≠ | Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103-123. DOI ↗ | Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521788304 |
| Aliases | Travel Package Conjoint Analysis, Tourism Product Profile Analysis, Holiday Package Part-Worth Estimation, Tourism Attribute Decompositional Preference Analysis | Destination Discrete Choice Experiment, Holiday Destination Choice Modelling, Stated-Choice Destination Selection, Destination Attribute Choice Analysis |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | Tourism product conjoint analysis is a decompositional preference-measurement technique that breaks travellers' overall judgments of holiday packages into the separate contributions, or part-worths, of each package attribute. Building on the conjoint framework articulated by Green and Srinivasan (1978), the method presents respondents with whole travel-package profiles, each combining levels of attributes such as price, trip duration, board basis, accommodation class and included activities, and asks them to rate or rank the packages. From these holistic evaluations it statistically recovers how much each attribute level adds to or subtracts from preference, and how important each attribute is overall. Unlike choice-based methods that model selection among alternatives, traditional ratings-based conjoint treats preference as a quantity to be decomposed, making it a natural tool for designing and optimising tourism products and bundles. | A destination choice experiment is a stated-preference technique that asks travellers to choose among experimentally designed hypothetical destinations, each described by a bundle of attributes such as price, travel distance, climate, the type and quality of attractions, and crowding. Grounded in random-utility theory and the stated-choice toolkit codified by Louviere, Hensher and Swait (2000), the method estimates a discrete-choice model that recovers the implicit weight travellers place on each attribute, the trade-offs they are willing to make, and the marginal willingness to pay for improvements. Huybers (2003) applied this framework to short-break holiday destination choices, showing how designed choice tasks reveal which destination features actually drive selection. Because the attributes are manipulated by design rather than merely observed, the experiment isolates the causal effect of each feature on choice in a way that revealed-preference travel data cannot. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|