ScholarGate
Assistant

Compare methods

Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.

Strengths Assessment×Ecomap Analysis×Genogram Analysis×Goal Attainment Scaling×
FieldSocial WorkSocial WorkSocial WorkSocial Work
FamilyProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Year of origin2012197820081968
OriginatorDennis Saleebey (strengths perspective); Charles Rapp & Richard Goscha (strengths model assessment)Ann HartmanMonica McGoldrick & Randy Gerson (standardized notation); Murray Bowen (theoretical roots)Thomas J. Kiresuk & Robert E. Sherman
TypeStructured, domain-based assessment of client and environmental strengthsGraphical, qualitative person-in-environment assessment toolGraphical, qualitative family-assessment toolIndividualized, criterion-referenced outcome measurement procedure
Seminal sourceSaleebey, D. (Ed.). (2013). The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice (6th ed.). Pearson. ISBN: 9780205011544Hartman, A. (1978). Diagrammatic assessment of family relationships. Social Casework, 59(8), 465–476. DOI ↗McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R., & Petry, S. (2008). Genograms: Assessment and Intervention (3rd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN: 9780393705096Kiresuk, T. J., & Sherman, R. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4(6), 443–453. DOI ↗
AliasesStrengths-Based Assessment, Strengths Perspective Assessment, Strengths Model Assessment, Asset-Based AssessmentEcomap, Eco-Map, Ecological Map, Hartman EcomapGenogram, Family Genogram, Family Diagram, McGoldrick GenogramGAS, Goal Attainment Scale, Kiresuk-Sherman Goal Attainment Scaling, Individualized Goal Scaling
Related3333
SummaryStrengths assessment is a structured way of assessing a client that deliberately foregrounds capabilities, resources, and aspirations rather than deficits and problems. Grounded in the strengths perspective articulated by Dennis Saleebey and operationalized in Charles Rapp and Richard Goscha's strengths model, it surveys the client's life domains — such as daily living, health, finances, relationships, leisure, and spirituality — to record what is already working, what the person wants, and the personal and environmental resources available to get there. Those strengths then become the raw material for goal-setting and intervention.An ecomap is a graphical map of a household or individual set within their social environment, showing the connections between the focal system and the external systems around it — extended family, work, school, health care, friends, agencies, religion, and recreation — and coding each connection as strong, tenuous, or stressful, with arrows for the flow of energy and resources. Ecomap analysis is the practice of drawing and interpreting this map to assess the person-in-environment, the central organizing concept of social work. It was introduced by Ann Hartman in 1978.A genogram is a graphical map of a family across at least three generations that uses standardized symbols to record its structure, key biographical and medical events, and the quality of relationships among members. Genogram analysis is the practice of constructing such a map with a client and then interpreting it to reveal intergenerational patterns — of illness, relationships, roles, conflict, and resilience — that shape the presenting situation. Standardized by Monica McGoldrick and Randy Gerson and grounded in Bowen family-systems theory, it is a staple qualitative assessment tool in social work and family therapy.Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a method for measuring the outcomes of an individualized intervention by writing, in advance, a small set of client-specific goals and defining for each a graded scale of possible outcomes from much worse than expected to much better than expected. After the intervention, the actual outcome on each goal is scored on this scale and the scores are combined into a single standardized index, allowing idiosyncratic, personally meaningful goals to be aggregated and compared across clients and programs. It was introduced by Thomas Kiresuk and Robert Sherman in 1968 to evaluate community mental health programs.
ScholarGateDataset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Go to search Download slides

ScholarGateCompare methods: Strengths Assessment · Ecomap Analysis · Genogram Analysis · Goal Attainment Scaling. Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/compare