Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Sport Sponsorship Effectiveness Analysis× | Motivation Scale for Sport Consumption× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Sport Leisure Studies | Sport Leisure Studies |
| Family≠ | Process / pipeline | Latent structure |
| Year of origin≠ | 2000 | 2001 |
| Originator≠ | Richard Speed & Peter Thompson; T. Bettina Cornwell & Isabelle Maignan | Galen T. Trail & Jeffrey D. James |
| Type≠ | Applied measurement pipeline for sponsorship outcomes | Multidimensional self-report psychometric scale |
| Seminal source≠ | Speed, R., & Thompson, P. (2000). Determinants of Sports Sponsorship Response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 226-238. DOI ↗ | Trail, G. T., & James, J. D. (2001). The motivation scale for sport consumption: Assessment of the scale's psychometric properties. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24(1), 108-127. link ↗ |
| Aliases≠ | Sponsorship Response Analysis, Sponsor-Event Congruence Analysis, Sponsorship Recall and Image Transfer Measurement, Sports Sponsorship Evaluation | MSSC, Sport Consumption Motivation Scale, Trail-James Motivation Scale |
| Related≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Summary≠ | Sport sponsorship effectiveness analysis measures whether and how a sponsor's investment in a team, event, or athlete pays off in consumer awareness, attitudes, and behavior. Cornwell and Maignan's 1998 international review organized the field around the measurement of sponsorship effects, distinguishing awareness outcomes such as sponsor recall and recognition from attitudinal outcomes such as image transfer and purchase intention. Speed and Thompson's 2000 study identified the determinants of sponsorship response within a classical-conditioning framework, showing that consumers' attitude toward the event, their perception of how well the sponsor fits the event, the sponsor's perceived sincerity and ubiquity, and their own involvement jointly shape favorable responses. The analysis combines outcome measures (recall, image transfer, favorability) with the key explanatory construct of sponsor-event fit or congruence, allowing sponsors to evaluate and predict the return on a sponsorship rather than assume that exposure alone produces value. | The Motivation Scale for Sport Consumption (MSSC) is a multidimensional self-report instrument that measures why people consume spectator sport, developed by Galen Trail and Jeffrey James in 2001. Rather than treating sport interest as a single drive, the MSSC distinguishes nine separable motives — achievement, acquisition of knowledge, aesthetics, drama, escape, family, physical skill of the players, physical attractiveness of participants, and social interaction — each measured as its own latent factor. Trail and James built the scale to address psychometric weaknesses they saw in earlier spectator-motivation measures, assessing its content, criterion, and construct validity and its internal consistency in their Journal of Sport Behavior paper. Because different motives predict different consumption behaviors, the MSSC lets researchers and marketers profile a fan base on the specific reasons people attend, watch, and spend, and it became one of the most widely used spectator-motivation instruments in sport marketing. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|