ScholarGate
Assistant

Compare methods

Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.

Sport Fandom Autoethnography×Fan Engagement Netnography×
FieldSport Leisure StudiesSport Leisure Studies
FamilyProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Year of origin20002002
OriginatorCarolyn Ellis & Arthur Bochner (autoethnography)Robert V. Kozinets (netnography)
TypeReflexive qualitative pipeline for narrating and analyzing personal fandomEthnographic pipeline for studying online sport fan communities
Seminal sourceEllis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 733-768). Sage. ISBN: 9780761915126Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61-72. DOI ↗
AliasesFan Autoethnography, Sport Spectator Autoethnography, Self-Narrative of Fandom, Reflexive Fan InquiryOnline Fan Community Netnography, Sport Fan Netnography, Digital Fandom Ethnography, Fan Community Online Ethnography
Related33
SummarySport fandom autoethnography turns the researcher's own experience of being a fan into systematic qualitative inquiry, using the self as a window onto the culture of fandom. Drawing on the method Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner developed and named, it joins three elements -- auto (the self), ethno (culture), and graphy (the writing process) -- so that personal stories of devotion, ritual, heartbreak, and belonging become evidence about how fandom works. The approach ranges from evocative autoethnography, which writes emotionally compelling scenes that let readers feel the fan's world, to more analytic forms that explicitly theorize the cultural patterns the stories reveal. Rather than surveying fans from the outside, the autoethnographer mines remembered epiphanies, match-day field notes, and personal artifacts to show, from within, what it means to live as a supporter.Fan engagement netnography adapts ethnography to the online communities where sport fans gather, talk, argue, and create -- forums, fan pages, comment threads, and social-media groups -- in order to understand how fans engage with their teams and with one another. Robert Kozinets coined netnography to bring ethnographic rigor to the study of online communities, treating their archived communication as a naturalistic field site that can be observed and interpreted. Applied to fandom, the method follows fans into their digital habitats and reads the practices that unfold there: the rituals, rivalries, in-jokes, devotion, and co-creation through which engagement is enacted. Rather than asking fans about their behavior in a survey, the netnographer studies what fans actually do and say online, combining naturalistic observation, immersion, and careful interpretation under explicit ethical safeguards.
ScholarGateDataset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Go to search Download slides

ScholarGateCompare methods: Sport Fandom Autoethnography · Fan Engagement Netnography. Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/compare