ScholarGate
Assistant

Compare methods

Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.

Social Cost-Benefit Analysis for Development×Randomized Evaluation in Development×
FieldDevelopment StudiesDevelopment Studies
FamilyProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Year of origin19742003
OriginatorIan Little & James Mirrlees (OECD/UNIDO appraisal traditions)Esther Duflo, Abhijit Banerjee, Michael Kremer; J-PAL / IPA
TypeEconomic project appraisal methodExperimental impact evaluation design
Seminal sourceLittle, I. M. D., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1974). Project Appraisal and Planning for Developing Countries. London: Heinemann / New York: Basic Books. ISBN: 9780465064106Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2009). The Experimental Approach to Development Economics. Annual Review of Economics, 1, 151–178. DOI ↗
AliasesSocial CBA, Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis, Project Economic Appraisal, Shadow-Price Cost-Benefit AnalysisRandomized Controlled Trials, Field Experiments in Development, RCTs in Development Economics, Randomized Field Trials
Related44
SummarySocial cost-benefit analysis (social CBA) is the economic appraisal of development projects from the standpoint of society as a whole rather than the private investor. It values every input and output at its shadow (economic) price — the true opportunity cost or social worth, which in distorted developing-country markets diverges from observed market prices — then discounts the resulting net benefit stream at a social discount rate to compute an economic net present value (ENPV) and economic internal rate of return (EIRR). The method was systematised for developing countries by Ian Little and James Mirrlees and by the parallel UNIDO guidelines.Randomized evaluation applies the logic of the controlled experiment to development policy: an intervention — a school grant, a deworming pill, an insurance product — is assigned at random to some units and withheld from others, so that any subsequent difference in outcomes can be attributed causally to the intervention rather than to confounding. Championed from the early 2000s by the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL) and Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA), the approach earned its leading proponents — Esther Duflo, Abhijit Banerjee, and Michael Kremer — the 2019 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for transforming how anti-poverty programmes are tested.
ScholarGateDataset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Go to search Download slides

ScholarGateCompare methods: Social Cost-Benefit Analysis for Development · Randomized Evaluation in Development. Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/compare