Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Schwartz Value Survey× | Moral Foundations Questionnaire× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Political Psychology | Political Psychology |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 1992 | 2011 |
| Originator≠ | Shalom H. Schwartz | Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt et al. |
| Type≠ | Self-report values survey | Self-report values inventory |
| Seminal source≠ | Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. DOI ↗ | Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366-385. DOI ↗ |
| Aliases | SVS, Schwartz Theory of Basic Values, Portrait Values Questionnaire | MFQ, MFQ-30, Moral Foundations Theory Questionnaire |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | The Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) operationalizes Schwartz's (1992) theory of basic human values, which identifies ten (later refined to nineteen) motivationally distinct values organized in a circular structure along two axes: openness to change versus conservation, and self-enhancement versus self-transcendence. It is the most widely used cross-cultural values instrument and underlies much research on the value basis of political ideology. | The Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) is a 30-item self-report instrument developed by Graham, Haidt and colleagues (2011) to measure the degree to which people rely on five intuitive moral foundations: Care/harm, Fairness/cheating, Loyalty/betrayal, Authority/subversion, and Sanctity/degradation. It is the standard operationalization of Moral Foundations Theory, which argues that political and cultural moral disagreements arise from differing weights placed on these foundations. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|