ScholarGate
Assistant

Compare methods

Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.

Recreation Experience Preference Scales×Recreation Substitutability Analysis×
FieldSport Leisure StudiesSport Leisure Studies
FamilyLatent structureProcess / pipeline
Year of origin19961991
OriginatorB. L. Driver; Michael J. Manfredo & Michael A. TarrantBo Shelby & Jerry Vaske; Seppo Iso-Ahola
TypeLatent-structure measurement model of desired psychological outcomes of recreationApplied analytic pipeline for recreation substitution
Seminal sourceManfredo, M. J., Driver, B. L., & Tarrant, M. A. (1996). Measuring Leisure Motivation: A Meta-Analysis of the Recreation Experience Preference Scales. Journal of Leisure Research, 28(3), 188-213. DOI ↗Shelby, B., & Vaske, J. J. (1991). Resource and Activity Substitutes for Recreational Salmon Fishing in New Zealand. Leisure Sciences, 13(1), 21-32. DOI ↗
AliasesREP Scales, Driver REP Scales, Recreation Experience Preferences, Desired Outcomes ScalesLeisure Substitutability Analysis, Recreation Substitution Assessment, Activity-Resource Substitution Analysis, Substitutability of Leisure Behavior
Related44
SummaryThe Recreation Experience Preference (REP) scales are a hierarchical battery of self-report measures, developed by B. L. Driver and colleagues over three decades, that quantify the desired psychological outcomes people seek from recreation. Rather than asking which activity someone prefers, REP asks why — capturing the experiences a person hopes to attain, organized into broad domains (such as enjoying nature, escaping pressure, achievement, affiliation, and learning) that each contain narrower scales. Manfredo, Driver, and Tarrant's 1996 meta-analysis in the Journal of Leisure Research consolidated more than three dozen studies that had used REP items, documenting a stable factor structure and reliable subscales and establishing REP as the standard motivational measure in outdoor recreation. The instrument operationalizes the behavioral, or expectancy-valence, view that recreation is goal-directed: people choose settings and activities expecting to satisfy specific experiential goals.Recreation substitutability analysis studies the interchangeability of leisure experiences, asking when and for whom one recreation activity, site, or time can acceptably replace another. Bo Shelby and Jerry Vaske's work, exemplified by their 1991 study of salmon fishing in New Zealand, organized substitution into distinct types, varying the activity, the resource or setting, the timing, or the strategy of participation, and measured anglers' willingness to accept each kind of substitute when their preferred option was unavailable. Seppo Iso-Ahola's 1986 theory framed substitution as a psychological process in which perceived freedom of choice is the critical mediator: people substitute more willingly when they feel they are choosing rather than being forced, and when the alternative shares the valued qualities of the original. The analysis combines a typology of substitution with measures of willingness conditioned on choice freedom, the quality of alternatives, and recreationists' specialization and commitment.
ScholarGateDataset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Go to search Download slides

ScholarGateCompare methods: Recreation Experience Preference Scales · Recreation Substitutability Analysis. Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/compare